Since the jihadist-backed upheaval of August 5, 2024, Bangladesh has ceased to function as a purely sovereign political arena. Instead, it has rapidly devolved into a contested battleground where foreign powers are aggressively maneuvering to establish dominance—using Islamist proxies, covert networks, and political manipulation as their primary tools.

At the center of this unfolding crisis stands Jamaat-e-Islami, an ideological offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood. While cloaked in the language of electoral participation, Jamaat’s long-term objective remains unchanged: the dismantling of Bangladesh’s secular framework and the imposition of a Sharia-based order. The current geopolitical scramble in Bangladesh involves three principal actors—China, Turkey, and the United States—each pursuing influence through a mix of overt diplomacy and covert engagement with Islamist forces.

Yet, the most consequential role is being played behind the scenes by Pakistan’s powerful intelligence agency, the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI). Acting as a shadow broker, the ISI is simultaneously facilitating the strategic objectives of both Washington and Beijing—two global rivals—underscoring the deeply transactional nature of modern geopolitics. This is not routine diplomacy. It is calculated strategic penetration.

The recent controversy surrounding the Chinese Embassy in Dhaka offers a revealing glimpse into how influence is cultivated at the grassroots level. Under the pretext of humanitarian assistance, the embassy distributed Eid al-Fitr food packages at an event attended by Ambassador Yao Wen and Jamaat leader Shafiqur Rahman. The official narrative claimed the aid was for “residents in Dhaka”. In reality, it was concentrated within the Dhaka-15 constituency—Jamaat’s political stronghold.

When Jamaat attempted to claim credit for the distribution, Beijing reacted with visible irritation, issuing a statement to reassert its position. But the episode had already exposed a calculated attempt to embed influence within Islamist political structures while maintaining plausible deniability.

More strikingly, this engagement occurred despite the electoral victory of the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), led by Tarique Rahman. China’s selective outreach sends a clear message: long-term influence matters more than electoral outcomes.

Jamaat-e-Islami’s participation in elections has long been used to project a veneer of democratic legitimacy. This is misleading. The organization’s foundational doctrine is rooted not in pluralism, but in the establishment of a theocratic state. Its electoral participation is best understood as a tactical pathway to power—not a commitment to democratic norms.

Reports cited by The Washington Post suggest that elements within the United States may view Jamaat’s rise as strategically useful. If accurate, this reflects a high-risk calculation—one that could empower forces fundamentally opposed to democratic governance.

Even more alarming are reports of a clandestine plot to carve out a new “Christian state” from territories spanning Bangladesh, Myanmar, and India. According to findings linked to India’s National Investigation Agency (NIA), several foreign nationals—including an American citizen named Mathhew Aaron VanDyke and six Ukrainians—namely Hurba Petro, Slyviak Taras, Ivan Sukmanovskyi, Stefankiv Marian, Honcharuk Maksim, and Kaminskyi Viktor. One of the detained Ukrainian nationals is from the Foreign Intelligence Service of Ukraine (Sluzhba zovnishn’oyi rozvidky Ukrayiny), while some of the detainees are believed to have links to the controversial Azov Brigade, known for its involvement in high-risk operations. Intelligence sources have suggested that such operatives possess expertise in covert activities, including sabotage and targeted violence. If substantiated, this would represent a serious escalation—an attempt not just to influence, but to reshape regional geography through covert destabilization.

Before her removal from power in August 2024, Bangladesh’s former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina issued repeated warnings about foreign conspiracies aimed at destabilizing Bangladesh. She stated that she had been offered political continuity in exchange for allowing a foreign power to establish a military airbase on Bangladeshi soil.

Hasina also warned of a broader plan involving territorial fragmentation and the creation of a new state in the region.

Hasina’s refusal, she indicated, led to mounting pressure and ultimately her removal from office. Whether viewed as political warning or contested claim, subsequent developments have given these statements renewed weight. The circumstances surrounding Hasina’s departure raise critical questions. Was this purely an internal political transition—or part of a coordinated external effort?

Allegations that the change in power was facilitated by a nexus involving the United States, China, and Turkey—with operational support from Pakistani spy agency Inter-Service Intelligence (ISI)—point to a deeply troubling possibility: that Bangladesh’s political trajectory is being shaped beyond its borders.

Bangladesh’s geographic position makes it a strategically valuable state in the broader Indo-Pacific landscape. Influence over its political direction carries implications for regional security, maritime routes, and power balances.

However, the growing entanglement of foreign powers and Islamist networks risks turning Bangladesh into a sustained proxy battleground. Such a scenario would have far-reaching consequences, including instability in India’s northeast, increased tensions in Myanmar’s Rakhine State, and wider regional disruption.

What is unfolding in Bangladesh is not merely a domestic political crisis. It is a struggle over sovereignty in the face of expanding external influence. Foreign powers are not only observing developments—they are actively shaping them, often through indirect channels and ideological intermediaries.

For Bangladesh, the stakes are exceptionally high. The country now faces a defining moment: preserve its sovereign decision-making or risk becoming an arena for competing external interests. The international community must also recognize the risks of unchecked intervention. Actions taken in pursuit of strategic advantage may ultimately destabilize an already fragile region.

Bangladesh’s future must be determined by its people—not by external actors or covert agendas.

Please follow Blitz on Google News Channel

The post Battle for dominance: Foreign powers target Bangladesh appeared first on BLiTZ.

[Read More]

—–
Source: Weekly Blitz :: Writings