The Islamic Republic of Iran was founded on a promise: to end hereditary tyranny and replace monarchy with divine justice. Nearly half a century later, that promise stands on the brink of collapse. The reported elevation of Mojtaba Khamenei — son of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei — signals not merely a succession plan, but a profound rupture in the ideological foundation of the 1979 revolution. If confirmed, Iran would be formalizing what it once condemned: the transfer of supreme power from father to son under the veneer of religious legitimacy.

For years, much of the non-Arab Muslim world has echoed Tehran’s narrative — blaming Washington and Jerusalem for hostility toward Iran, portraying Ali Khamenei as a pious and embattled defender of Islam. Meanwhile, across the Middle East, many governments remained conspicuously restrained as Tehran expanded its influence through sectarian militias and by wielding the “Palestine” card as a geopolitical instrument. Since 1979, the Ayatollahs in Tehran have institutionalized the annual observance of an event titled “International Quds Day”, to be observed on the last Friday of Ramadan. On August 7, 1979, he called upon Muslims worldwide to demonstrate solidarity with Palestinians and to oppose Israel’s control of Jerusalem. This was not a symbolic gesture: It was strategic mischief. As Khomeini knew, Jerusalem—Al-Quds—holds sacred significance for Muslims across sectarian lines, by centering his revolution around the “liberation” of Jerusalem, Khomeini effectively bypassed the Sunni-Shiite divide. He reframed Iran’s revolution not as a Shiite uprising, but as a pan-Islamic struggle against Israel and, by extension, against Western influence.

Later, Senior Iranian clerics, including Naser Makarem Shirazi, described participation in Quds Day as a religious duty — elevating political mobilization into spiritual obligation. The message was clear: supporting Iran’s framing of the Palestinian issue was not merely political — it was religiously mandated. Meanwhile, the Islamic Republic moved beyond symbolism. Through relationships with groups such as Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad, Iran embedded itself directly into the Palestinian arena. These alliances allowed Tehran to exert tangible influence in conflicts that resonate across the Sunni world.

A theocratic monarchy under the façade of Islamic rule

When the Islamic Republic overthrew the Pahlavi monarchy in 1979, its architects insisted that hereditary power was un-Islamic and unjust. Ali Khamenei himself repeatedly condemned the former shah’s rule as a “cruel and unreasonable hereditary monarchy”, celebrating its destruction as one of the revolution’s greatest achievements. Today, however, the system appears poised to replicate the very structure it once denounced.

Reports from Iranian and international media sources indicate that under pressure from the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), the Assembly of Experts has chosen Mojtaba Khamenei as the next Supreme Leader. If accurate, this marks a historic rupture: the Islamic Republic would effectively become a family enterprise sustained not by clerical consensus, but by military coercion. The irony is profound. The revolution that promised to eradicate dynastic power may now institutionalize it. There is a deeper constitutional and theological complication.

Under the Iranian constitution, the Supreme Leader must possess the highest level of Shiite clerical authority — a Grand Ayatollah, a marja’ at-taqlid capable of independent jurisprudential reasoning (ijtihad) and religious decree.

Mojtaba Khamenei does not meet that standard. As of early March 2026, domestic Iranian outlets continued referring to him as a Hojjat ol-Islam — a mid-level clerical rank significantly below that of Grand Ayatollah. In religious hierarchy, the gap is not cosmetic; it is foundational. The difference between Mojtaba’s rank and that constitutionally required is akin to the difference between a recent graduate and a tenured scholar.

Mojtaba’s father, Ali Khamenei, also lacked the requisite rank when he ascended to power in 1989 following the death of Ruhollah Khomeini. At the time, the regime moved swiftly to manufacture theological legitimacy. In a pre-digital era without searchable archives, internal maneuvering and opaque documentation shielded the process from widespread scrutiny. Mojtaba Khamenei will not enjoy that advantage. In an era of digital archives, online seminarian networks, and global transparency, theological fabrication would be far more difficult to conceal.

If Mojtaba lacks religious authority, he appears to possess something arguably more decisive: the backing of the IRGC. It may be mentioned here that, over the past several decades, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has evolved from ideological militia into Tehran’s dominant political, military, and economic force. It controls vast sectors of the national economy, oversees regional proxy networks, and maintains decisive leverage over domestic security.

Mojtaba Khamenei’s reported elevation is widely viewed as inseparable from IRGC patronage. This creates a dangerous inversion of the Islamic Republic’s original power structure. Under Khomeini, the clerics reigned supreme and the military obeyed. Under Mojtaba, it may be the generals who decide and the clerics who comply.

Even Alireza Arafi, a senior cleric aligned with the establishment and head of Iran’s seminaries, has reportedly expressed concern about the erosion of clerical authority in favor of security institutions. The balance of power has shifted from mosque to barracks. Such a transformation risks triggering internal dissent among traditional seminaries that once saw themselves as guardians of religious legitimacy rather than instruments of military will.

The succession question cannot be separated from the vast financial empire accumulated under Ali Khamenei’s rule. A 2013 investigation by Reuters documented the scale of assets controlled by Setad Ejraiye Farmane Hazrate Emam — commonly known as Setad — an organization under the Supreme Leader’s authority. Based on analyses of stock exchange data, corporate disclosures, and US Treasury assessments, Reuters estimated Setad’s holdings at approximately US$95 billion at the time. Subsequent assessments by critics and analysts suggested that the broader network of assets connected to the Supreme Leader could be far higher. These assets span real estate, finance, telecommunications, oil, pharmaceuticals, and numerous other sectors. Much of this wealth, critics argue, was consolidated through opaque mechanisms, property seizures, and shell companies operating domestically and abroad.

While millions of Iranians struggle under inflation, sanctions, and economic stagnation, the Supreme Leader’s office presides over a financial apparatus rivaling sovereign wealth funds. This empire now becomes a strategic instrument in the succession struggle. If Mojtaba Khamenei lacks theological gravitas, he possesses access to enormous financial leverage. Wealth can reward loyalty, silence dissent, and consolidate patronage networks. In a system where economic dependency often determines political allegiance, financial power may substitute for clerical authority. However, the durability of Mojtaba’s rule is far from assured.

The United States and Israel have demonstrated willingness to target senior IRGC commanders involved in regional operations. The attrition of key security figures could weaken the military pillar supporting his leadership. If enough IRGC commanders are removed or neutralized, the clerical establishment — which retains constitutional authority to impeach the Supreme Leader — may reconsider its alignment. A clerical backlash, though unlikely in the immediate term, cannot be dismissed. Moreover, dynastic succession undermines the ideological narrative that sustained the Islamic Republic for decades. It transforms a revolutionary system into an oligarchic structure visibly detached from its founding myth.

Please follow Blitz on Google News Channel

The post Mojtaba Khamenei: The billionaire devil in the throne of Iranian mullahs appeared first on BLiTZ.

[Read More]

—–
Source: Weekly Blitz :: Writings