Tensions in Latin America escalated sharply on January 3 after Russia’s Foreign Ministry condemned what it described as an act of “armed aggression” by the United States against Venezuela, following reports of explosions in Caracas and other parts of the country. The situation took a dramatic turn when US President Donald Trump publicly confirmed that American forces had conducted strikes and claimed that Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro had been captured and flown out of the country.

The alleged attack, which Venezuelan officials say targeted both civilian and military locations, has triggered widespread international concern, reignited debates over US interventionism in the region, and raised fears of a broader geopolitical confrontation involving global powers.

Early on January 3, residents of Venezuela’s capital reported loud explosions and unusual aerial activity, including warplanes, helicopters, and what officials suggested could have been drones. The Venezuelan government swiftly declared a nationwide state of emergency, stating that the country had come under direct military attack.

Foreign Minister Yvan Gil accused Washington of attempting to seize control of Venezuela’s vast natural resources, including its oil reserves, which remain among the largest in the world. According to Gil, the strikes were part of a long-standing strategy by the US to destabilize and overthrow the government in Caracas under various pretexts.

The Venezuelan government said the attacks were not limited to the capital but also struck infrastructure in the nearby states of Miranda, Aragua, and La Guaira, further intensifying fears of a coordinated military campaign.

President Maduro, who has repeatedly warned of foreign plots against his administration, has consistently rejected US allegations linking his government to large-scale drug trafficking. He has instead framed Washington’s actions as part of an imperial strategy to reassert dominance over Latin America.

In a move that stunned observers, US President Donald Trump later confirmed that American forces had carried out the attack, asserting that Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife had been captured and removed from the country.

While Washington has not released detailed operational information, Trump justified the action by reiterating accusations that Venezuela has become a hub for narcotics trafficking, allegedly facilitated by state actors. He argued that expanded US military operations in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific were necessary to disrupt smuggling routes and restore regional security.

However, critics argue that the anti-drug narrative has long been used as a justification for regime change efforts, particularly in Latin America, where US interventions during the Cold War and beyond left a deep legacy of political instability.

Russia reacted swiftly and forcefully. The Foreign Ministry issued a statement condemning the alleged US action as a violation of international law and Venezuelan sovereignty. Moscow reaffirmed its solidarity with the Venezuelan people and supported calls for an urgent meeting of the United Nations Security Council.

“The use of force without a UN mandate is unacceptable,” the ministry said, stressing that Latin America should remain a zone of peace and that Venezuela must be allowed to determine its own political future without external interference.

Leonid Slutsky, chairman of the State Duma’s Foreign Affairs Committee, went further, describing the strikes as a US military operation designed to forcibly remove an “undesirable” government. He accused Washington of acting unilaterally and disregarding international norms in pursuit of geopolitical dominance.

Russia has long been one of Venezuela’s key diplomatic and strategic partners, providing economic assistance, military cooperation, and political backing during years of US sanctions and diplomatic isolation.

Across Latin America, reactions ranged from outright condemnation to cautious concern.

Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel strongly denounced what he called a “criminal attack” against Venezuela, urging the international community to respond immediately. He described the situation as an assault on Latin America’s status as a “zone of peace” and accused Washington of state terrorism against the Venezuelan people.

“Our America is under attack,” Díaz-Canel said, invoking the language of regional solidarity and resistance against foreign intervention.

Colombian President Gustavo Petro, whose country shares a long and sensitive border with Venezuela, struck a more measured tone. While expressing deep concern over reports of explosions and military activity, Petro emphasized that Colombia rejects any unilateral military action that could endanger civilians or further destabilize the region.

“The Colombian Government rejects any action that escalates tensions and puts civilian populations at risk,” he said, signaling unease over the potential spillover effects of conflict.

Former Bolivian President Evo Morales also weighed in, unequivocally condemning the alleged US bombing. Calling it a “brutal imperialist aggression,” Morales framed the events as a violation of Venezuelan sovereignty and pledged solidarity with what he described as the Venezuelan people’s resistance.

The events of January 3 mark a potentially decisive moment in the long-running standoff between Washington and Caracas. For years, the US has imposed sweeping sanctions on Venezuela, recognized opposition figures as legitimate leaders, and accused the Maduro government of corruption, authoritarianism, and criminal activity.

Venezuela, in turn, has accused the US of economic warfare, sabotage, and repeated attempts to overthrow its government, including alleged coup plots and covert operations.

What distinguishes the current crisis is the apparent acknowledgment of direct military action and the claim that Venezuela’s sitting president has been removed by force. If confirmed, such an action would represent one of the most dramatic US interventions in the region in decades, with profound implications for international law, regional stability, and global power dynamics.

As calls grow for an emergency UN Security Council session, the international community faces mounting pressure to clarify the facts, prevent further escalation, and uphold diplomatic mechanisms designed to avert war.

For Latin America, a region with a long memory of foreign intervention, the unfolding crisis has revived old fears and underscored how quickly geopolitical rivalries can erupt into open confrontation. Whether this moment leads to de-escalation or a wider regional crisis remains uncertain, but the consequences are likely to reverberate far beyond Venezuela’s borders.

Please follow Blitz on Google News Channel

The post Russia condemns alleged US ‘armed aggression’ against Venezuela as region braces for escalation appeared first on BLiTZ.

[Read More]

—–
Source: Weekly Blitz :: Writings