Indian Foreign Minister Dr. Subrahmanyam Jaishankar has issued a sharp rebuttal to Washington’s accusations that New Delhi is exploiting Russian crude imports to profit at the expense of global stability, insisting that India’s oil trade is both legitimate and essential for maintaining market balance. His remarks come amid escalating tensions in US-India trade relations, with fresh tariffs imposed by Washington and ongoing disputes over New Delhi’s ties with Moscow.

The dispute has been brewing for months, but intensified after senior US officials, including former trade adviser Peter Navarro and US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, criticized India’s decision to continue importing discounted Russian crude oil despite Western sanctions and mounting geopolitical pressure over the Ukraine conflict.

Navarro was particularly scathing in his recent comments, accusing India of running “a refining profit-sharing scheme” that acts as “a laundromat for the Kremlin.” His remarks were a pointed reference to India’s practice of importing Russian crude, refining it into petroleum products, and then exporting some of those products to markets in Europe and the United States.

Bessent echoed these allegations earlier this month, claiming India was “profiteering” off global instability by purchasing Russian oil at a discount and reselling refined products.

To further raise the stakes,  President Donald Trump announced a 25% tariff hike on imports from India, explicitly linking it to New Delhi’s continued oil purchases from Russia. The additional tariff, set to take effect on August 27, comes on top of another 25% duty imposed earlier in the year after trade talks between the two nations stalled.

In remarks delivered at an Economic Times event in New Delhi, Jaishankar rejected the accusations outright and defended India’s energy strategy as a matter of national interest.

“If you have a problem buying oil or refined products from India, don’t buy it. Nobody forces you to buy it,” he said bluntly, pointing out that the same countries criticizing India also continue to purchase energy supplies indirectly linked to Russia. “Europe buys, America buys, so you don’t like it, don’t buy it.”

He stressed that India’s approach to energy imports was guided by both domestic and international considerations. “Russian oil imports serve both Indian and global interests, helping to stabilize oil prices,” Jaishankar said, noting that access to affordable crude has been vital for controlling inflation and ensuring energy security for India’s vast population.

India’s stance reflects a broader geopolitical balancing act. On the one hand, New Delhi has sought to strengthen its partnership with Washington as part of the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (Quad) and other Indo-Pacific initiatives aimed at countering China’s growing influence. On the other, India has long-standing ties with Russia, including major defense contracts and decades of energy cooperation.

This dual alignment has put India under intense scrutiny since the start of the Ukraine war. Western governments have urged New Delhi to reduce its reliance on Russian oil, but India has resisted, arguing that it must prioritize affordable energy to support economic growth.

Jaishankar has consistently emphasized that India will act according to its national interest, not external pressure. His latest remarks underscore the government’s determination to push back against what it sees as unfair and hypocritical criticism from the West.

Beyond energy, the oil dispute has spilled into broader trade relations between the two countries. The announcement of fresh tariffs by Washington marks a significant escalation and threatens to undermine years of progress in building closer economic ties.

India is the United States’ ninth-largest trading partner, with bilateral trade surpassing $190 billion in recent years. However, disputes over market access, agricultural subsidies, technology transfers, and now oil imports have complicated the relationship.

Although a US delegation was expected to visit New Delhi for another round of negotiations on August 25, the trip was abruptly canceled last week. Jaishankar, however, downplayed the setback. “Negotiations are still going on in the sense that nobody said the negotiations are off,” he said. “People do talk to each other.”

He also emphasized that while the talks may face hurdles, they have not broken down permanently. “There are red lines such as the interests of Indian farmers that we will always protect,” Jaishankar added, suggesting that India will not compromise on certain domestic priorities in pursuit of a trade deal.

At the heart of the dispute lies a fundamental disagreement over how best to manage global energy flows in the wake of the Ukraine war. Washington and its European allies argue that reducing purchases of Russian energy is essential to depriving Moscow of revenue that funds its military campaign.

India counters that cutting off Russian crude would destabilize global energy markets, driving up prices and disproportionately harming developing countries. By purchasing Russian oil, refining it, and then re-exporting products such as diesel, New Delhi argues that it is contributing to stabilizing global supply chains rather than undermining them.

This difference in perspective reflects a broader divide between Western economies and emerging markets over the costs of sanctions and the equitable distribution of global energy resources. For India, which imports more than 80% of its crude needs, the issue is existential rather than ideological.

The confrontation over Russian oil imports has now become a litmus test for the resilience of the India-US partnership. While both sides recognize the strategic value of cooperation in countering China, trade frictions and energy disputes risk overshadowing shared interests.

For India, the message is clear: it will not be coerced into abandoning a pragmatic energy policy that secures affordable supplies for its people. For Washington, the challenge will be to reconcile its geopolitical goals with the economic realities of partners like India, who cannot afford to sever ties with Russia overnight.

Whether the two countries can navigate these tensions without derailing their broader strategic partnership remains to be seen. But as Jaishankar’s remarks highlight, New Delhi is determined to assert its autonomy in global affairs – even if that means standing up to Washington.

Please follow Blitz on Google News Channel

The post India pushes back against US claims on Russian oil imports appeared first on BLiTZ.

[Read More]

—–
Source: Weekly Blitz :: Writings