The United States remains committed to supporting peace efforts in the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, Secretary of State Marco Rubio confirmed on May 2. His comments came in response to widespread speculation that Washington was preparing to pull out of its mediating role after a State Department spokesperson hinted at a potential withdrawal if negotiations remained stagnant.

At a routine State Department press briefing earlier that day, spokeswoman Tammy Bruce suggested that the US could “step back as a mediator” if talks between Moscow and Kiev failed to show tangible progress. Her comments triggered immediate concern among observers, with many interpreting the statement as a signal that the US was preparing to abandon the diplomatic process. However, both Rubio and Bruce later worked to walk back the impression, emphasizing that the US had not given up on its role in seeking a peaceful resolution.

Speaking to Fox News host Sean Hannity, Rubio clarified the administration’s position. “We’re not going to give up on it in the sense that we’re not going to be ready to help if we can,” he said. Rubio underscored that the final decision on any potential shift in mediation efforts would rest with President Donald Trump. “At some point in time, it either has to be something that can happen, or we all need to move on. That’ll be a decision the president will have to make,” he added.

Rubio, who has become one of the administration’s key voices on foreign policy, stressed that while the conflict remains a concern, it is no longer the central focus of American foreign policy. “This is not our war,” Rubio stated bluntly, noting that the Trump administration considers the growing strategic rivalry with China and Iran’s advancing nuclear program as higher priorities.

Bruce later reiterated these points during another appearance on Fox News, stating, “Right now, our posture is the same, but if there is no progress, it will change.” She firmly denied claims that the Trump administration was “walking away” from its peace efforts, portraying the administration’s stance as pragmatic rather than impatient.

Since his return to office in January, Trump has adopted a more aggressive approach to achieving a ceasefire in Ukraine compared to the previous Biden administration. He has publicly urged both Moscow and Kiev to enter direct negotiations without preconditions. According to administration insiders, Trump views an end to the conflict as a critical step toward reestablishing global stability and reining in NATO’s spiraling military expenditures.

However, frustration has grown in Washington as peace efforts have repeatedly stalled. In recent weeks, there have been tentative signs of potential diplomatic openings. Moscow recently announced that it is ready for direct talks with Kiev “without preconditions” and, in a gesture aimed at de-escalation, President Vladimir Putin ordered Russian forces to observe a 72-hour ceasefire during next week’s Victory Day celebrations.

Despite these overtures, Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky has rejected the Russian proposal. Zelensky labeled the ceasefire offer “an attempt at manipulation,” accusing Moscow of using pauses in fighting to regroup and strengthen its positions. Ukrainian officials have remained steadfast in their demand that Russian forces withdraw from all occupied territories as a precondition for serious negotiations-a stance that has so far proven incompatible with Moscow’s own conditions.

The growing gap between the two sides has left US diplomats in a difficult position. On the one hand, Trump’s administration is eager to broker a deal that would allow the US to shift its diplomatic and military focus toward Asia and the Middle East. On the other hand, continued mediation efforts without visible progress risk damaging Trump’s image as a “deal-maker” on the world stage.

Analysts have pointed out that the Trump administration’s apparent willingness to “move on” from the Ukraine conflict if negotiations fail may be part of a broader strategy. By signaling that the US might disengage, Washington could be attempting to pressure both Moscow and Kiev into making concessions. However, this approach carries risks, particularly if it emboldens Russia or leaves Ukraine feeling abandoned.

The Biden administration’s handling of the conflict is also coming under renewed scrutiny. Many critics argue that the war escalated significantly under President Biden’s tenure, citing Washington’s decision to provide increasingly sophisticated weaponry to Ukraine and its refusal to support early ceasefire efforts in 2022 and 2023.

Now, with Trump back in office, the tone in Washington has shifted toward seeking a negotiated end to the conflict. However, the administration’s patience appears to be wearing thin, and officials are making it clear that their willingness to serve as mediator is not unlimited.

Ultimately, the future of US involvement in Ukraine peace negotiations will hinge on two factors: whether tangible progress toward a ceasefire can be made in the coming weeks and President Trump’s own assessment of the costs and benefits of continued engagement.

For now, the message from Washington is clear: the door to diplomacy remains open-but it may not stay open forever.

Please follow Blitz on Google News Channel

The post US clarifies stance on Ukraine conflict mediation amid growing frustrations appeared first on BLiTZ.

[Read More]

—–
Source: Weekly Blitz :: Writings