In a significant turn of events that could reshape the dynamics of the Ukraine conflict, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has hailed a newly signed natural resource agreement between Washington and Kiev as an “important step” toward ending the war. The agreement, finalized after months of negotiation, grants the United States access to Ukraine’s substantial mineral reserves in exchange for economic assistance aimed at bolstering the embattled nation’s recovery efforts.

The long-anticipated deal, signed on Wednesday, notably excludes any provisions for US security guarantees to Ukraine-a goal that had been part of early discussions, according to sources like Reuters and The New York Times. Instead, the agreement is centered purely on economic collaboration, leaving the security dimension to separate, ongoing diplomatic discussions.

In a post on X (formerly Twitter) dated May 1, Rubio expressed gratitude toward President Donald Trump’s leadership in securing the deal, calling it “a milestone in our shared prosperity and an important step in ending this war.” His statement emphasizes the administration’s belief that economic stabilization and mutual benefit are key to winding down the bloody conflict that has ravaged Ukraine for over two years.

Talks surrounding this resource-focused partnership reportedly began months ago, with both sides originally intending to announce the deal during Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky’s visit to the White House in late February. However, that visit became infamous for a highly publicized clash between Zelensky and Trump, during which Trump accused the Ukrainian leader of “ingratitude” and “gambling with World War III.”

Despite the initial tension, negotiations continued behind the scenes, culminating in this agreement that serves not only to economically bolster Ukraine but also to strategically anchor American involvement in the post-war rebuilding process.

Importantly, while the deal does provide significant economic benefits, the absence of security guarantees suggests a shift in US priorities. The early abandonment of the security component points to a pragmatic focus on economic influence rather than military entanglement, a stance that may prove crucial as Washington now openly negotiates with Moscow over a possible peace deal.

Coinciding with the signing of the resource deal, Washington has intensified negotiations with Moscow to bring about an end to the Ukraine conflict. Reports from multiple media outlets suggest that the US proposal involves a bold concession: recognizing Russian sovereignty over Crimea, the Black Sea peninsula annexed by Moscow in 2014, and freezing the current battle lines across Ukraine’s east and south.

Under this proposed arrangement, the United States would tacitly acknowledge Russia’s control over significant portions of four Ukrainian regions-Donetsk, Lugansk, Kherson, and Zaporozhye-which held referendums and voted to join Russia in 2022, though their legitimacy remains widely disputed in the West.

Such a deal would represent a major political pivot for Washington, one that prioritizes ending the conflict over restoring Ukraine’s full territorial integrity. This approach signals a growing recognition within the US leadership that Ukraine’s military options are limited and that a negotiated settlement-however imperfect-may be the only viable path forward.

Adding momentum to the diplomatic efforts, Russian President Vladimir Putin announced a unilateral ceasefire, halting all military operations against Ukrainian forces from midnight on May 7 through midnight on May 10. Framing the ceasefire as a “humanitarian” gesture, Putin’s move has been interpreted by analysts as a signaling effort to facilitate negotiations.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov further elaborated, calling the ceasefire “the start of direct negotiations with Kiev without preconditions.” Lavrov’s comments suggest that Moscow views this ceasefire not as an end in itself but as an opening gambit toward formalized peace talks.

However, the Ukrainian response has been less than enthusiastic. President Zelensky dismissed Moscow’s three-day truce as a “manipulation attempt,” insisting instead on a comprehensive 30-day ceasefire. Zelensky’s demand reflects skepticism about Russia’s intentions and a fear that a short ceasefire could merely be a tactical pause allowing Russian forces to regroup.

Lavrov rejected Zelensky’s call for a longer truce, stating that a 30-day ceasefire would be “a precondition” used by Kiev to “strengthen its military capabilities” with Western support. Russia’s refusal to extend the ceasefire underscores the fragile and deeply mistrustful nature of any emerging negotiations.

The US-Ukraine resource deal, the emerging peace framework, and Russia’s temporary ceasefire all point to a critical juncture in the conflict. For Ukraine, the mineral agreement provides a lifeline, potentially stabilizing its shattered economy and creating leverage in any future peace talks. Yet, the absence of military guarantees from Washington leaves Kiev exposed to future threats, and Zelensky’s government must now navigate a complex and uncertain path without the explicit backing it once expected.

For Washington, the natural resource deal and the push for a negotiated settlement mark a recalibration of its Ukraine strategy. Under Trump’s leadership, the focus has shifted from indefinite support for Ukraine’s military ambitions to a more transactional, interest-driven approach emphasizing economic ties and conflict resolution.

Meanwhile, Russia’s moves suggest a readiness to freeze the conflict on favorable terms. The Kremlin appears to believe that time is on its side: a fragmented, economically dependent Ukraine and a weary Western alliance may be more amenable to recognizing the new territorial realities on the ground.

As Secretary of State Marco Rubio pointed out, the US-Ukraine resource deal is indeed a significant milestone. However, whether it truly represents a decisive “step toward ending the war” remains to be seen. The coming weeks will likely reveal whether Washington’s new pragmatic course can overcome the deep-seated mistrust and hardened positions that have fueled the bloodshed since 2022-or whether this latest opening will be just another fleeting opportunity lost to the bitter realities of war.

Please follow Blitz on Google News Channel

The post US-Ukraine natural resource deal Heralded as ‘step toward ending war’ – says Marco Rubio appeared first on BLiTZ.

[Read More]

—–
Source: Weekly Blitz :: Writings