The White House has issued a forceful denial of reports that it is considering replacing Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, following bombshell allegations that he shared sensitive military information via an encrypted messaging app. The administration has dismissed the claims as part of a politically motivated media smear campaign, even as critics raise concerns about national security and calls for an official investigation grow louder.

The controversy began on April 20, when The New York Times published an article alleging that Hegseth used the encrypted messaging platform Signal to share key operational details regarding an impending US bombing campaign in Yemen. According to the Times, the information was sent to several close associates, including his wife, Jennifer, his brother, Phil, and his personal attorney, Tim Parlatore. The leak reportedly took place on March 15.

While the details shared in the message were reportedly not technically classified, they included precise timing and logistical elements of the military operation-information typically restricted to top-level military and intelligence officials. The report, citing an anonymous source briefed on the matter, immediately triggered alarm among  analysts and members of Congress, who questioned whether the act constituted a breach of military protocol or even a violation of federal law.

In the wake of the Times article, National Public Radio (NPR) followed up with its own report on April 21, claiming that the White House was discreetly vetting possible replacements for Hegseth. The report cited an unnamed official who said internal discussions had begun in anticipation of Hegseth’s potential resignation or removal due to the controversy. According to the NPR report, officials were “deeply concerned” about the political fallout and legal risks associated with the alleged Signal messages.

However, the Trump administration was quick to respond, launching a full-scale counteroffensive to discredit the reports. On the night of April 21, the White House’s official X account “Rapid Response 47” posted a blunt rebuttal, “Lies from NPR – which, as we all know, is a Fake News propaganda machine.”

The post asserted that Defense Secretary Hegseth continued to enjoy the “full confidence” of President Trump and that the administration had no plans to replace him.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt reinforced the message on social media, wrote – “This NPR story is total FAKE NEWS based on one anonymous source who clearly has no idea what they are talking about. As the President said this morning, he stands strongly behind the Secretary of Defense.”

In an appearance on Fox & Friends-the same program Hegseth co-hosted before entering the Trump administration-Leavitt again defended the Secretary. “Let’s be clear,” she said. “What Secretary Hegseth shared was not classified. It was sensitive, yes, but within the bounds of legal and ethical communications. And as far as the White House is concerned, this is nothing more than an orchestrated media smear campaign by outlets desperate to undermine this administration.”

According to sources close to the White House, President Trump personally called Hegseth on the evening of April 20, just hours after the New York Times report was published. Trump reportedly assured Hegseth of his support and blamed the story on “deep state leakers” and “disgruntled ex-employees.” One person briefed on the call told reporters that Trump admired Hegseth’s combative tone and refusal to back down, which mirrored the President’s own media strategy.

The following morning, Hegseth made his first public appearance since the controversy erupted. At the White House Easter Egg Roll event, he confronted reporters during an impromptu press scrum, blasting the media coverage as “a hoax” and “deep state nonsense.”

“These are hit pieces, plain and simple,” Hegseth told journalists gathered on the White House lawn. “We’ve seen this playbook before-anonymous sources, twisted narratives, total fabrications. This isn’t journalism. It’s sabotage. I spoke to the President last night, and we’re on the same page. We are not backing down.”

A longtime Trump loyalist and former Fox News commentator, Hegseth was appointed as Defense Secretary in late 2024, a move that was heavily criticized by establishment figures in Washington due to his lack of senior military or Pentagon experience. However, for Trump’s political base, Hegseth was viewed as a much-needed disruptor in a bloated and overly politicized military bureaucracy.

Despite the White House’s unified pushback, the allegations continue to stir debate in Washington. Senator Tammy Duckworth (D-IL), a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, issued a formal statement calling for an immediate inquiry into Hegseth’s actions. Duckworth urged the committee to subpoena communications logs and other relevant documents related to the alleged Signal group chat.

“If these reports are true, it represents a gross violation of national security protocols,” Duckworth said. “The American people deserve answers. Sharing operational military details with unauthorized individuals, regardless of classification level, is reckless and irresponsible. There must be accountability.”

National security analysts remain split on whether the alleged Signal messages amount to a prosecutable offense. Some argue that while the communication may not constitute a legal breach, it signals a worrying breakdown in discipline and judgment at the highest levels of government.

“This isn’t just about one message,” said Michael O’Hanlon, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution. “It’s about the culture it reveals. If top officials are casually discussing sensitive operations through informal channels, even encrypted ones, it raises serious questions about information security and institutional oversight.”

As of now, there is no indication of a formal investigation by the Department of Defense or the Department of Justice. However, multiple sources have indicated that internal reviews of Pentagon communication protocols have been quietly initiated in recent days.

While Pete Hegseth remains in his position, the broader implications of the controversy remain unclear. Whether the matter fades from public view or escalates into a larger political crisis will likely depend less on legal determinations and more on the Trump administration’s ability to control the narrative heading into the 2024 election.

One thing, however, is certain: the line between governance, political loyalty, and media warfare continues to blur under the Trump administration. As a staunch loyalist and media-savvy combatant, Pete Hegseth now finds himself not just in charge of the Pentagon, but also on the front lines of a broader battle for public perception-and perhaps his own political survival.

Please follow Blitz on Google News Channel

The post White House denies plans to replace Defense Secretary amid signal leak allegations appeared first on BLiTZ.

[Read More]

—–
Source: Weekly Blitz :: Writings