As geopolitical tensions continue to escalate in Eastern Europe, a new potential flashpoint has emerged: the possible delivery of long-range German Taurus missiles to Ukraine. The United Kingdom has now indicated its backing of such a move, despite clear warnings from Russia that such actions could significantly escalate the ongoing conflict.

According to a report published by The Telegraph on April 16, British government sources confirmed that the UK would support Germany if it decided to provide Ukraine with the Taurus cruise missiles, which are capable of striking targets up to 500 kilometers away. This development follows statements from Germany’s likely next chancellor, Friedrich Merz, who has expressed willingness to send the weapons to Kyiv-a sharp departure from the cautious stance of outgoing Chancellor Olaf Scholz.

Merz, the leader of Germany’s Christian Democratic Union (CDU), told German state broadcaster ARD on April 13, “I have always said that I would do it,” referring to supplying Taurus missiles to Ukraine. He emphasized that European partners such as the UK and France are already supplying cruise missiles-Storm Shadow and Scalp respectively-and that Germany should not be an exception.

“Our European partners are already supplying cruise missiles… The British are doing it, the French are doing it, and the Americans are doing it,” Merz stated, highlighting what he considers a growing consensus among NATO powers in favor of long-range support for Ukraine’s defense.

The Taurus missiles, developed by MBDA Deutschland, are known for their precision and long reach, making them suitable for targeting command centers, logistics hubs, and critical infrastructure deep inside Russian-occupied territory, including the strategically vital Kerch Bridge connecting Crimea to mainland Russia.

The UK’s support appears aligned with its broader policy of arming Ukraine with advanced Western weaponry. “We continue to work with our partners, including Germany, to equip Ukraine as best we can to defend its sovereign territory,” a British foreign policy official told The Telegraph, in what appears to be a nod of approval toward Berlin’s potential policy shift.

The British government has already supplied Kyiv with Storm Shadow missiles, which have been used in several reported strikes on Russian logistics and ammunition depots. In the eyes of London, the transfer of Taurus missiles would represent a continuation-not an escalation-of Western support aimed at helping Ukraine resist Russian aggression.

However, Moscow has taken a starkly different view.

The Kremlin has repeatedly warned that the provision of long-range missiles to Ukraine would be considered a grave provocation and could lead to a significant escalation of hostilities. Russian officials have emphasized that such weapons would allow Ukraine to hit targets well beyond the battlefield, including inside Russian territory. The Kerch Bridge, a symbol of Russia’s annexation of Crimea, is one such potential target.

Russian foreign ministry and defense officials have stated that Western military aid prolongs the war and hampers any meaningful peace negotiations. While Russia continues its offensive operations across eastern and southern Ukraine, the leadership in Moscow views the supply of high-precision, long-range cruise missiles as a red line-one that, if crossed, could trigger retaliatory measures far beyond the front lines.

While Merz’s CDU is pushing for a more assertive stance, including Taurus missile deliveries, the issue remains deeply divisive within Germany’s political establishment.

Outgoing Chancellor Olaf Scholz, a member of the center-left Social Democratic Party (SPD), has been steadfast in opposing the transfer of the missiles. Scholz has warned that such a move could “draw Germany directly into war with Moscow” due to the strategic implications and potential use of the weapons on Russian soil.

Even within the SPD, there is concern that the Taurus’ extended range and destructive capabilities could provoke an unpredictable Russian response. Party leader Matthias Miersch suggested that Merz may reconsider his position once he is fully briefed on the confidential security implications surrounding the Taurus system.

German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius, also of the SPD, previously described “many good arguments” against delivering the missiles. Among these are national security risks and the possibility of Germany being perceived as a direct belligerent in the conflict, a line that Berlin has sought to avoid crossing throughout the war.

CDU defense spokesman Roderich Kiesewetter acknowledged to The Telegraph that the missile delivery issue remains a “point of contention” in the ongoing coalition negotiations between the CDU and SPD, which are expected to conclude with Merz becoming Chancellor in May.

If Germany decides to greenlight the Taurus deliveries, it would mark a significant evolution in NATO’s involvement in the Ukraine war. While the alliance has provided billions in weapons, intelligence, and logistical support, it has so far walked a tightrope to avoid direct confrontation with Russia.

Merz’s potential policy shift, backed by the UK, could increase pressure on other European states to escalate their military support further. However, the risk of unintended consequences-particularly a broader war involving NATO-remains a pressing concern.

From a military standpoint, Taurus missiles could dramatically improve Ukraine’s ability to disrupt Russian supply lines and command structures far behind the front. From a geopolitical standpoint, they represent a high-stakes gamble that the Kremlin’s threats will not materialize into full-scale retaliation.

The UK’s endorsement of Germany’s possible Taurus missile transfer is another indication of the West’s shifting posture toward the Ukraine war. As Kyiv’s counteroffensives stall and Russian advances continue, calls for increased military aid grow louder. Yet, the path forward remains fraught with peril.

Friedrich Merz may soon face one of the most consequential decisions of his chancellorship before it even begins. Should he authorize the Taurus deliveries, he would fulfill a campaign promise and align Germany more closely with its NATO allies. But he would also risk inflaming tensions with Russia to new heights.

Whether this marks a turning point in Europe’s approach to the war or a step toward greater escalation will depend not only on Berlin’s final decision-but on Moscow’s response to it.

Please follow Blitz on Google News Channel

The post UK backs Germany sending Taurus missiles to Ukraine despite escalation risks appeared first on BLiTZ.

[Read More]

—–
Source: Weekly Blitz :: Writings