In trademark bravado, President Donald Trump has claimed that dozens of countries are scrambling to avoid his sweeping new tariffs, with foreign leaders “begging” for customized trade deals. Speaking at a National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) dinner on April 8, Trump offered a brash assessment of the global reaction to his latest round of import duties, set to escalate further today.
“I’m telling you, these countries are calling us up, kissing my ass,” Trump said, sparking laughter and applause from Republican lawmakers and donors in attendance. “They are dying to make a deal: ‘Please, please sir, make a deal. I’ll do anything, I’ll do anything sir.’”
The statement, while crude, underscored Trump’s belief that his aggressive trade strategy is forcing countries to the negotiating table. Starting today, the United States will implement a new wave of tariffs, including a headline-grabbing 104% duty on Chinese goods. The administration says this is part of a broader push for “reciprocal trade,” in which nations with significant trade surpluses must agree to better terms for American exports-or face economic penalties.
According to the White House, nearly 70 countries have already opened discussions with the administration to negotiate exemptions or soften the impact of the new levies. Trump emphasized that he is not interested in blanket policies, but rather “tailored deals” crafted to fit each country’s specific trade profile.
“I call them tailored deals, not off the rack,” Trump said earlier on April 8 during an executive order signing at the White House. “We’re not doing these dumb multilateral things anymore where we get the short end of the stick every time. Every country is different, and we’re going to make them pay attention to that.”
These remarks came as the administration prepares for legal challenges from trade partners and faces growing domestic unease about the economic repercussions of escalating tariffs. The new measures have already drawn criticism from business groups, economists, and even some Republican lawmakers.
Despite the controversy, Trump doubled down on his assertion that the tariffs are not only economically beneficial but also politically strategic.
“We’re going to win the midterm elections, and we’re going to have a tremendous, thundering landslide,” he told the NRCC audience. “And I really think we’re helped a lot by the tariff situation that’s going on, which is a good situation… it’s going to be legendary, you watch.”
Trump’s confidence in the electoral payoff of his trade policy may reflect a broader strategy to galvanize support among working-class voters who feel betrayed by decades of outsourcing and globalization. He frequently ties tariffs to job creation, claiming the measures are helping to rebuild American manufacturing.
However, critics point to mounting evidence that tariffs have led to increased costs for US consumers, strained supply chains, and retaliatory actions from trade partners that hurt American exporters-especially farmers and small businesses.
Even within his own party, not all lawmakers are comfortable with Trump’s approach. In recent months, a bipartisan group of senators introduced legislation to curb presidential authority to impose tariffs beyond a 60-day window without congressional approval. Trump dismissed these efforts as disloyal and shortsighted.
“Some of these Republicans want to tie our hands behind our backs,” he said. “We’re finally in a position of strength, and they want to give it away. It’s pathetic.”
The clash highlights a fundamental tension within the GOP: traditional pro-trade conservatives versus the nationalist-populist wing Trump commands. While the Republican establishment long favored free trade and low tariffs, Trump has reshaped the party’s economic orthodoxy to favor protectionism-at least rhetorically.
Among the most dramatic components of the new tariff package is a 104% duty on imports from China. The administration claims this is necessary to offset years of intellectual property theft, unfair subsidies, and a massive bilateral trade deficit.
“We’re not going to be their piggy bank anymore,” Trump declared. “We lose hundreds of billions of dollars a year to China. Not anymore. That’s over.”
Beijing has so far responded cautiously, hinting at countermeasures but stopping short of announcing a full-blown trade war. However, analysts warn that further escalation could have unpredictable consequences, including price hikes for American consumers and deeper global economic volatility.
While Trump insists the US is collecting “$2 billion a day” in tariff revenue, many economists argue that such figures are misleading. Tariffs are effectively a tax on imports, meaning the burden is often passed on to American companies and consumers in the form of higher prices.
“The idea that tariffs are being paid by foreign governments is economically inaccurate,” said Dr. Laura Peterson, a trade economist at the Brookings Institution. “The reality is that much of that revenue is being collected from US importers, and eventually, consumers.”
Nonetheless, some US-based manufacturers have benefited from reduced foreign competition, especially in steel, aluminum, and certain electronics. Whether these gains outweigh the costs is still hotly debated.
Reactions from foreign governments have ranged from outrage to overtures. European officials have called the tariffs “unilateral and dangerous,” while several Asian economies have quietly begun backchannel talks with Washington.
“There’s a lot of diplomatic activity happening behind the scenes,” said a senior trade official who spoke on condition of anonymity. “Many countries want to avoid a direct confrontation with Trump and are instead trying to negotiate their way out of the firing line.”
This puts Trump in a position of considerable leverage, at least in the short term. Whether this leverage results in long-term benefits for the US economy-or simply deepens global trade instability-remains an open question.
Donald Trump’s unapologetically aggressive trade policy represents a sharp departure from decades of US economic diplomacy. With his latest comments, he has made it clear that he sees tariffs not only as a tool of economic policy but also as a weapon of political persuasion.
Whether or not his approach succeeds will likely depend on a volatile mix of international reactions, domestic economic indicators, and political momentum heading into the 2026 midterms. But one thing is certain: Trump is once again rewriting the rules of engagement-both on the global stage and within his own party.
Please follow Blitz on Google News Channel
The post Trump boasts foreign leaders are ‘kissing my ass’ to avoid new tariffs appeared first on BLiTZ.
[Read More]
—–
Source: Weekly Blitz :: Writings
Comments are closed. Please check back later.