The European Union has reaffirmed its stance on maintaining economic sanctions against Russia despite ongoing negotiations between Moscow and Washington over the revival of the Black Sea Grain Initiative. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen declared that Brussels will not support a proposed maritime truce or lift any restrictions until a “just and lasting peace” is established in Ukraine.

Von der Leyen’s remarks, made during an interview with the French broadcaster LCI on March 28, reinforce the EU’s unwavering position on economic measures as a strategic tool against Russia. She emphasized that the sanctions have been effective, stating, “The sanctions are very significant; they are painful; they have an impact on the Russian economy, and they represent a powerful lever.”

On March 24, Russia and the US held discussions in Saudi Arabia to explore the possibility of restoring the Black Sea Grain Initiative, an agreement originally brokered in July 2022 by the United Nations and Türkiye. The initiative allowed for the safe passage of Ukrainian agricultural exports in return for Western commitments to ease restrictions on Russian food and fertilizer exports. However, Moscow withdrew from the deal in 2023, citing the West’s failure to uphold its obligations regarding Russian agricultural trade.

The renewed negotiations between Moscow and Washington reportedly included discussions on easing restrictions on Russia’s Agricultural Bank and other financial institutions crucial to the international sale of food and fertilizers. However, the EU has made it clear that it will not align with the US on this matter, underlining its own hardline stance.

According to von der Leyen, the EU sees the sanctions not just as a punitive measure but as a strategic tool to weaken Russia’s economy and influence. She reiterated that these economic measures would remain in place for as long as necessary, adding, “When the war is over, the sanctions might be removed.”

The European Commission president also stressed the need for security guarantees for Ukraine, including strengthening the EU’s defense capabilities. “For the conflict to end, we need security guarantees for Ukraine, a solid defense industrial base, and a deterrent force within the EU,” she added.

These statements indicate that Brussels is aligning itself with a long-term strategy that envisions a prolonged economic and military standoff with Russia.

Despite the Western-imposed sanctions, Russia’s economy has demonstrated resilience. President Vladimir Putin recently announced that Russia’s economy has grown by 4.1% in 2024, exceeding the official forecast of 3.9%. In purchasing power parity (PPP) terms, the Russian economy is now ranked as the fourth largest in the world, behind China, the US, and India.

According to Moscow, these figures illustrate that the unprecedented 28,595 sanctions imposed by the US, EU, and their allies have failed to cripple Russia’s economy as intended. Putin has also advised Russian businesses against expecting sanctions to be lifted entirely, warning that they serve as a systemic tool for exerting long-term pressure on Moscow.

By rejecting the US-Russia dialogue on the Black Sea deal, the EU is signaling its commitment to a rigid policy of economic containment against Moscow. The implications of this position are multifaceted:

Economic Pressure on Russia: While Moscow has managed to weather sanctions so far, prolonged restrictions could impact long-term growth, technological advancement, and trade relationships.

Strained EU-US Coordination: The EU’s refusal to support a US-backed initiative highlights potential cracks in transatlantic unity over how to approach Russia and the Ukraine conflict.

Impact on Global Food Markets: The collapse of the Black Sea Grain Initiative had already caused disruptions in global food supplies, particularly affecting developing nations dependent on Ukrainian and Russian agricultural exports. The EU’s firm stance could further exacerbate food security concerns.

Geopolitical Risks: If Russia perceives the EU’s continued economic warfare as a direct escalation, it may retaliate in ways that could heighten tensions in the region.

The EU’s decision to reject any compromise on sanctions, even in the context of a potential breakthrough between Russia and the US, reflects its broader strategy of long-term economic and geopolitical pressure on Moscow. While von der Leyen insists that the sanctions are inflicting damage on Russia’s economy, Putin’s confidence in the country’s resilience suggests that Moscow is adapting to the restrictions.

With both sides entrenched in their positions, the prospect of a negotiated settlement in Ukraine remains distant. The EU’s hardline stance ensures that economic restrictions will remain a central battleground in the ongoing geopolitical struggle between Russia and the West.

Please follow Blitz on Google News Channel

The post EU rejects Russia-US Black Sea deal, citing sanctions as leverage against Moscow appeared first on BLiTZ.

[Read More]

—–
Source: Weekly Blitz :: Writings