US President Donald Trump has voiced his frustration over Russian President Vladimir Putin’s recent remarks questioning the legitimacy of Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky. Trump, who has long presented himself as a pragmatic negotiator on international affairs, stated that he was “very angry” and “pissed off” at Putin’s stance, while simultaneously insisting that his relationship with the Russian leader remains stable.
The controversy stems from Putin’s declaration that Zelensky is no longer the legitimate leader of Ukraine, given that his term expired in May 2024 without the holding of a new election. Russia has maintained that Ukraine’s parliament is now the sole legal authority in the country. Putin further suggested that Ukraine should be placed under a temporary UN-led administration to organize new elections and restore constitutional legitimacy.
Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One on March 30, Trump expressed clear discontent with Putin’s stance but stopped short of escalating tensions outright.
“He’s supposed to be making a deal with him, whether you like him or you don’t like him. So I wasn’t happy with that,” Trump remarked. Despite his irritation, he reaffirmed that his relationship with Putin has not deteriorated significantly, pointing to their long-standing rapport. Trump also revisited his well-worn critique of the “Russia, Russia, Russia” hoax, alleging that past allegations of collusion between his campaign and Moscow were politically motivated fabrications by figures such as Hillary Clinton and Congressman Adam Schiff.
Trump went further, threatening additional sanctions on Moscow if he determines that Russia is obstructing ceasefire negotiations between Ukraine and Russia. His comments indicate that, despite his previous admiration for Putin’s leadership style, he is willing to impose punitive measures if he perceives that Russia is derailing diplomatic progress.
At the same time, Trump’s stance on Zelensky has not always been consistent. In February, he referred to the Ukrainian leader as a “dictator without elections,” a statement he later seemed to walk back. Nevertheless, his recent comments reflect a shift, at least temporarily, toward defending Zelensky’s position as Ukraine’s leader, albeit within the framework of ongoing negotiations.
Zelensky has refused to hold a new election, citing martial law due to the ongoing conflict. This has drawn criticism from various quarters, both domestically and internationally. While the US and its Western allies have continued to back him, Russia’s labeling of his government as “illegitimate” raises questions about the stability of any diplomatic agreement reached under his leadership.
Putin has warned that negotiating a peace settlement with Zelensky’s government could be futile, as “other leaders might come tomorrow,” implying that any agreement could be rendered void if Zelensky is removed from power. This assertion suggests that Moscow is positioning itself to engage with alternative political forces in Ukraine, further complicating the diplomatic landscape.
Trump’s frustration with Putin’s comments comes amid a delicate 30-day partial ceasefire brokered by Washington between Russia and Ukraine. The agreement includes a provision for both sides to halt attacks on energy infrastructure, a significant issue given Ukraine’s vulnerability to Russian airstrikes and Russia’s concerns over Ukrainian drone attacks on its territory.
While Zelensky has publicly backed the ceasefire, reports from the Russian Defense Ministry suggest that Ukrainian forces have violated the agreement on multiple occasions. Moscow has accused Kyiv of attempting to undermine Trump’s mediation efforts, an allegation that, if proven true, could strain US-Ukraine relations. Nevertheless, the Kremlin has stated that it will honor the ceasefire as a gesture of goodwill toward the US, indicating that it is still interested in maintaining a line of communication with Washington.
Despite backing Zelensky in the current dispute, Trump has had a tumultuous relationship with the Ukrainian leader. His latest remarks included a warning that Ukraine’s attempt to renegotiate a rare-earth minerals deal with the US would lead to “big, big problems.” The agreement, which is vital for securing critical materials used in defense and technology industries, has been a point of contention between Kyiv and Washington. Trump’s warning suggests that he views Zelensky as an unreliable partner who may not always act in America’s best interests.
During his previous presidency, Trump was impeached over a phone call with Zelensky, in which he allegedly pressured the Ukrainian leader to investigate Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, in exchange for military aid. While he was acquitted in the Senate, the incident has left lingering tensions in Trump’s approach to Ukraine. His skepticism toward Zelensky appears to have persisted, even as he positions himself as a key mediator in the ongoing conflict.
Trump’s reaction to Putin’s remarks is a rare instance of the former president openly criticizing the Russian leader. While he has often been accused by opponents of being too lenient toward Moscow, his latest comments suggest that he is willing to challenge Putin when he believes US interests are at stake.
If Trump follows through on his threat to impose new sanctions, it could mark a shift in his broader approach to Russia. However, given his insistence that his relationship with Putin remains intact, it is possible that his comments were meant more as a strategic warning than an outright declaration of hostility.
Trump’s disappointment over Putin’s remarks on Zelensky’s legitimacy highlights the complexity of the US position on Ukraine. While he remains critical of Zelensky in some respects, he appears to recognize that dismissing him outright would complicate diplomatic efforts. Meanwhile, his relationship with Putin remains a balancing act-one where he must navigate between maintaining dialogue with Moscow and asserting US influence in the ongoing conflict.
As ceasefire negotiations continue, Trump’s ability to mediate effectively will be tested. If the partial ceasefire holds and diplomatic progress is made, his efforts could be seen as a success. However, if violations persist and tensions escalate, Trump may find himself forced to take a firmer stance against Russia-something he has historically been reluctant to do. In the coming weeks, the world will watch closely to see how Trump’s words translate into action, and whether his disappointment with Putin leads to any tangible consequences for US-Russia relations.
Please follow Blitz on Google News Channel
The post Trump expresses disappointment over Putin’s comments on Zelensky’s legitimacy appeared first on BLiTZ.
[Read More]
—–
Source: Weekly Blitz :: Writings
Comments are closed. Please check back later.