US President Donald Trump has praised his recent conversations with Russian President Vladimir Putin, describing them as “very rational” and suggesting that he alone has the ability to negotiate an end to the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. Trump’s comments, made aboard Air Force One in an interview with OutKick on March 22, have reignited debate over the potential for a diplomatic resolution to the war.

During the interview, Trump emphasized his unique capacity to deal with Putin, claiming that no one else could bring the Russian leader to the negotiating table. “I don’t think there’s anybody in the world that [is] going to stop [Putin], except me, and I think I’m going to be able to stop him,” Trump stated. He added that he had developed a strong rapport with both Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, positioning himself as the key figure capable of brokering peace.

Trump also warned that the continued failure to resolve the conflict could escalate into World War III, though he reassured that “it’s somewhat under control.” His remarks reflect a broader concern about the global ramifications of the Ukraine war, particularly given its economic and geopolitical consequences.

Since taking office, Trump has sought to restore US-Russia relations, which had reached a nadir under his predecessor. His administration has actively pursued diplomatic channels, with Trump and Putin reportedly holding at least two phone calls in recent weeks regarding the conflict in Ukraine. These discussions have been complemented by direct negotiations between US and Russian delegations, underscoring a renewed effort toward de-escalation.

The most recent phone conversation, held on March 18 and lasting two and a half hours, was particularly significant. Trump proposed a 30-day ceasefire in Ukraine, an idea that Putin reportedly viewed favorably but with reservations. Moscow’s primary concerns included establishing a reliable monitoring mechanism to ensure compliance and preventing Ukraine from using the ceasefire to regroup, mobilize troops, or acquire new weaponry.

Despite these concerns, Putin expressed willingness to halt strikes on Ukrainian energy infrastructure for 30 days, provided Kiev reciprocated. This development signals a potential breakthrough, as attacks on critical energy infrastructure have been a major point of contention throughout the war.

Steve Witkoff, Trump’s special envoy to the Middle East, has suggested that a comprehensive ceasefire could be implemented within weeks. He indicated that Ukrainian officials have informally agreed to one of Moscow’s key demands-remaining outside of NATO. If confirmed, this would mark a significant concession from Kiev, potentially opening the door for further negotiations.

However, the most contentious issue remains the status of Crimea and the four other former Ukrainian regions that voted to join Russia. Moscow insists that these territories are now permanently part of Russia, while Ukraine continues to demand their return. Resolving this territorial dispute will be the most challenging aspect of any potential peace deal.

Trump’s approach to the Ukraine conflict represents a stark departure from the policies of previous US administrations, which have largely supported Ukraine’s military resistance through financial aid and arms shipments. His direct engagement with Putin signals a shift toward diplomacy, which may be welcomed by some but criticized by others as appeasement.

His critics argue that Trump’s willingness to negotiate with Putin could undermine Ukraine’s sovereignty and embolden Russia. They also point out that a temporary ceasefire without concrete guarantees might allow Moscow to consolidate its gains and prepare for future offensives. Additionally, there are concerns about Trump’s personal motivations in these negotiations, given his long history of praising Putin and advocating for improved US-Russia relations.

On the other hand, Trump’s supporters view his diplomatic outreach as pragmatic. They argue that the prolonged war has placed an economic strain on the US and its allies while exacerbating global instability. If Trump can successfully broker an end to the conflict, it could bolster his foreign policy credentials and strengthen his position ahead of future elections.

Despite Trump’s optimism, several significant obstacles remain in achieving a lasting peace. First, Ukraine’s leadership has not publicly confirmed any agreement to forgo NATO membership, and any formal commitment would require substantial domestic and international negotiations. Second, the issue of territorial sovereignty remains a major sticking point, with both sides unwilling to compromise.

Furthermore, key US allies, including European nations that have strongly supported Ukraine, may be wary of any deal that appears to favor Russia. NATO leaders have repeatedly emphasized their commitment to Ukraine’s defense and territorial integrity, which could complicate Trump’s diplomatic efforts.

Trump’s recent conversations with Putin represent a notable shift in the trajectory of the Ukraine war, introducing new possibilities for a ceasefire and potential peace negotiations. His claim that he alone can “stop” Putin will be tested in the coming weeks as diplomatic efforts continue.

While the proposed 30-day ceasefire is a promising step, the long-term resolution of the conflict hinges on resolving deeper geopolitical disputes, particularly concerning Ukraine’s territorial integrity and future security arrangements. If Trump succeeds in brokering peace, it would mark one of the most significant diplomatic achievements of his presidency. However, if the negotiations falter, the war is likely to continue with devastating consequences for Ukraine and global stability.

Please follow Blitz on Google News Channel

The post Trump hails ‘rational’ Putin conversations as ceasefire talks gain momentum appeared first on BLiTZ.

[Read More]

—–
Source: Weekly Blitz :: Writings